The Last Democracy

[True Story]

by Daniel J Towsey

http://www.mychurch.org/blog/105969/The-Last-Democracy

Will, where Do I start. With a title like that you might choose to read this article.

It’s going to be a very simple but shockingly scary one. Disbelieve this story at your own risk.

I live in Canada, or what’s left of it. This country was once a real democracy. Like many other former democracies from all over the world.[Please read my “Once upon a time there was a Canada”

 [Please read on, as this article pertains to the USA and also the whole world]

I have researched this situation for many years and i have allot of on hand knowledge as to the truth that i am about to share with you.

First let me explain to you the simple most important item that makes a real democracy.

It’s very simple. In a true democracy the people control the creation and management of money, also known as currency or legal tender[dollars].

If the people in a democratic society do not fully control the money and banking system, then they do not have a democracy. It’s that simple. For one has to understand that the money controls everything.

If you do enough brave in depth research as to the real truth of the past hundred years. You would discover that all the wars have been created to destroy the financial systems of democracies and replace it with ‘Federal reserve systems’.

This has all been financed by the American federal reserve. Most Americans still know nothing about the federal reserve. They believe that it is a federal government agency. Which it is not. It is a privately and secretly own secret society corporation. [ Please watch Aron Russo’s “America from freedom to fascism” Movie to better understand.

The federal reserve has never been audited or monitored by the people of the USA.

The single worse thing about this is that they have used the ability to create money out of thin air to create the most powerful military in human history. They have used this military and all the secret covert government agencies to systematically take over the world by any means they want.

They only abide to one rule…..”Never get caught’ That’s it.

We are soon approaching the one hundred year anniversary of the creation of the federal reserve.

It is so simple to understand that if the top is corrupt that over time the corruption will trickle down and eventually corrupt all of society. Which is where we are today.

Once you understand the power that money wields then and only then will you begin to understand the most horrible truth. Please remember this is not a theory. This is all true.

And there has been a conspiracy. It is a conspiracy of silence. Everyone is afraid to tell the truth.

Remember that Bravery only comes as a result of one thing. And that is truth. For without truth you are not brave.

The public has continuously been lied to about everything. The worse lie of all is the lie that the American military has been spreading democracy. That is impossible, as the USA is not a democracy. It ceased to be a democracy when the federal reserve was illegally created.

Today thanks to the internet anyone who is beginning to wake up can now start educating them selves and deprograming them selves of the lies and deceptions that we have all been told all our lives.

Unfortunately the free internet is going to come to an end soon. The process has already started. Download everything while you still can and share it with others.

There is only one thing you can do to fight this overwhelming evil. That is to join the “truth revolution’ It is very easy to join. all you have to do is start learning the scary truth and then you have to do the bravous thing of all. You have to spread that truth.

Remember the most powerful weapon is the seeds of truth delivered with words and not guns, bombs, Lasers, Microwave weapons, nuclear weapons,Biological weapons, etc, etc.

I have written many other articles that fully cover what you need to learn. I will provide links to them below.

Especially pay attention to the one “Recipe for insanity’

There has been many brave writers trying to tell you the truth and to wake you up before it is to late. That is a very hard thing to do since you have been in a brainwashed condition all your life. Society has been deliberately dumbed down over the past hundred years. We Are now at a point where most People have no idea what democracy is. Or why you should do everything you can to protect it….

You are running out of time. Soon the secret societies, the creators of the New World Order will have complete control over all of us.

Do not accept RFID chips or ID cards with hidden chips n them. For soon they will eliminate the need for money and all you will have is credits applied to your chips. When this time comes you will be completely controlled. [Also please read my “ Cell Phones’ Article to learn about the invasion of your privacy]

Now back to my article…

“The Last democracy”

This applies to Canada. For we are the last democracy in the world where the people control and create its currency. And we have our own Bank of Canada.

Canadians are not aware of the impending loss of our democracy with the coming North American Union. Once the union is formed we will no longer have a democracy, we will lose our sovereignty.

I have Heard the talking heads in the major medias call the USA republic and democratic system as just a failed experiment.

The idea that democracy is an experiment is absolutely scary. One note I would like to make is that we should never forget that all democracies of the world were created by Christians.

This should help you to understand why Christianity has been deliberately and covertly destroyed from the inside.

And when that did not work the countries were simply destroyed by fraudulent wars.

All other so called democracies that the Allieds have created in the past hundred years are not democracies at all. They all have federal reserve systems where the money is controlled by secret societies.

If you want proof please listen to John F Kennedy’s last speech on ‘secret societies’

John F Kennedy had also started dismantling the CIA and had already passed an executive order to print American Dollars backed by the government. The money had already been printed and he was about to circulate it.

“On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. President Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110 gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: ‘to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the treasury….’ Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve’s control over the creation of money.”

In his speech, John F Kennedy Asked for everyones help. He never got it. He was murdered instead. The newly released digitalized Zapruder film clearly shows the driver swing a silver hand gun over his right shoulder and shoot JFK in the left temple and out the back of the right side of the rear of his head. This digitalized film was pain staking created by professionals who photographed every single frame of the film and made a clear digital version of the original.

I also recommend that you watch the movie. “The money Masters’

Please get involved in the “TRUTH REVOLUTION”

Links

Once upon a time there was a Canada

http://my.opera.com/danieltowsey/blog/2007/08/15/once-upon-a-time-there-was-a-canada

America from freedom to fascism

www.freedomtofascism.com

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173

Recipe for insanity

http://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2007/08/25/recipe-for-insanity/

Cell Phones

http://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2007/06/24/cell-phones/

JFK Speech on secret societies

http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/jfk_secret_society_speech.htm

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1710662559138481080

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlghYpDx0f4

Canadians Completely Unaware of the Pending North American Union

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6346

JFK Zapruder Film

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/zapruder.htm

conspiraciesclub - huge resource to articles and documentary videos

http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansconspiraciesclub/

http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/dansconspiraciesclub/rss

The Money Masters

International Bankers Gained Control of America http://www.themoneymasters.com/ The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private … all » hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole…Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies, and republics the power to create the world’s money

http://www.themoneymasters.com/

Also see Alex Jones Terrorstorm - Fear & Propaganda CIA Tools of Tyranny

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5948263607579389947

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8136133221213939183&q=terrorstorm&total=556&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6885277369482418431&q=terrorstorm&total=556&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=4

If you can’t view it online then copy a link above and go to www.keepvid.com and download the fvl version. you need a flash player to watch it.

The Capitalist Conspiracy
This is an adaptation of a documentary filmstrip tracing the history of a small group of people who control the money systems of the world. It shows how this group is protected by governments and how its wealth is derived by creating money out of nothing. We see how this group wields power through government, foundations, education, and the mass media. It has aided such regimes as Russia and China, not because it is pro-Communist, but because a visible enemy and the threat of war have been useful in persuading the masses to embrace the group’s ultimate goal: a world government which they expect to control from behind the scenes. They are now working to replace fear of nuclear war with fear of global pollution as the motivation for world government. It is clear that the plan revealed in this program continues to unfold.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=449294564876413449&hl=en

Censorship and the Empire

Dieudonne and the Uses of “Anti-Semitism”

By DIANA JOHNSTONE

When power becomes blatantly criminal, it’s time to make people shut
up. That time seems to have come throughout the Empire. Freedom of
speech is increasingly threatened, both in the United States and in
“old Europe”, although the attacks come from quite different angles.

In the United States, the assault is clearly led by far right
fanatics such as David Horowitz, who is inciting students to denounce
professors who dare try to teach them something they didn’t think
they already knew. The purpose is clearly to ban criticism of United
States war policy.

In old Europe, the assault is more subtle and probably less lucid in
its aims. It is led in part by people who consider themselves on the
left and who seem blissfully unaware of the danger of limiting
freedom of speech.

In Germany, it has long been illegal to deny that the Holocaust took
place: the offense called “the Auschwitz lie” can be punished by up
to three years [actually, it’s five yearsŠ] in prison. German
television insists relentlessly on Hitler and his crimes, as if he
were still lurking in the wings. This has done nothing to prevent the
rise of neo-Nazi groups. It may even have helped them grow, in
accordance with the phenomenon, demonstrated in the Soviet zone, that
establishing “official truth”-even if true-can be the best way to
make many people believe the contrary. But more than that, the far
right in Germany seems to be gaining ground as a result of widespread
disillusion, especially in Eastern Germany, with the neoliberal
economic policies that were supposed to bring prosperity but instead
have brought growing unemployment and poverty.

In any case, the center left government of Social Democrats and
Greens has undertaken to react to rightist demonstrations by
broadening the law against “Volksverhetzung”-a concept that can be
translated as “incitement of the masses” or “poisoning of the minds
of the people”. In the future, it should not be enough to prosecute
persons who “approve, justify, deny or play down genocide of Jews and
gypsies” in a way apt to “disturb public peace” (a vague notion). The
new law would make it equally criminal to speak in any of those ways
about any case of “genocide” condemned by any international court
whose jurisdiction has been recognized by the government of the
Federal Republic of Germany.

Now, judicial history is marked by famously unjust verdicts reversed
after long struggles to right the wrong. But the German law could
make it a crime to challenge the International Tribunal on Former
Yugoslavia, set up by NATO powers to control and manipulate political
conflict in the Balkans, when it officially convicts Serbs for
“genocide”. Anyone who points out that the Tribunal’s definition of
“genocide” has been contrived for political purposes, and that its
procedures are blatantly prejudiced, might risk being arrested.

If there are to be limits on freedom of speech, they should be
directly related to action. Thus, if a political leader exhorts a
hall full of followers to go out and commit a pogrom, this can
legitimately be considered a criminal act. But the trend is to expand
criminalization of speech far beyond such incitements to embrace
expression of opinions, including opinions about the past-about facts
which by their very nature may be debated but cannot be changed.

In France, the restriction on freedom of speech also began with
criminalization of “the Auschwitz lie”. And as in Germany, it is
unlikely to stop there. Incitement to racial hatred or discrimination
has been outlawed in France since 1972. In July 1990, the French
National Assembly adopted an amendment extending the 1972 law to
persons who dispute the existence of crimes against humanity, as
defined by the Nuremburg tribunal, and “which have been committed
either by the members of an organization declared criminal […] or
by a person found guilty of such crimes by a French or international
jurisdiction”. The intent of this law was clearly to punish
statements denying the reality of the Nazi genocide against the Jews.
However, the unspecified reference to “international jurisdiction”
may have unwittingly opened the door to prosecution of persons
challenging the verdicts of quite different international tribunals,
such as the NATO-linked tribunal in The Hague.

The 1990 amendment, known as the “Gayssot law”, was introduced by a
Communist member of the Assembly. It seems that the French left,
especially the Communist Party, in its understandable desire to
preserve the legacy of the French Resistance during World War II, has
seen no danger in setting a precedent for punishing speech as well as
acts.

In recent years, the context has changed considerably. In the face of
worldwide protests over treatment of Palestinians, increasing efforts
have been made to extend the definition of “anti-Semitism” to cover
criticism of Israel. By insisting that there can be no distinction
between Jews and “the Jewish state” (a proposition vigorously denied
by many if not most French Jews), and thereby identifying criticism
of Israel with “anti-Semitism”, the ultra-Zionists seem to be
provoking the anti-Semitism they denounce. Whether or not this is
deliberate is debatable. France has the largest Jewish population in
Europe, a skilled and assimilated population that Ariel Sharon is
openly trying to lure to Israel by claiming that Jews are not safe
anywhere else, and notably not in France because of alleged
anti-Semitism.

Once criticism of Israel is identified with anti-Semitism, it becomes
implicitly taboo because of the association of anti-Semitism with
holocaust denial. A main practitioner of this moral intimidation is
Roger Cukierman, a far right Zionist who presides over the
“Representative Council of Jewish organizations of France” (CRIF). In
April 2002, Cukierman actually hailed the surprisingly strong showing
of Le Pen in the first round of the French presidential elections as
a “good lesson for the Arabs”. Cukierman surely does not represent
the countless French citizens of Jewish origin who are not members of
Jewish organizations. Nevertheless, CRIF’s annual dinner has become a
“must” for France’s political leaders, who listen docilely each year
while Cukierman castigates them for not doing enough to stop
anti-Semitism. (The exception, two years ago, was a Green who walked
out after Cukierman identified “Greens and Reds” with fascist
“browns” on account of their support to Palestinians.) This year,
sixteen cabinet ministers bowed their heads while Cukierman attacked
President Chirac’s foreign policy. By this is meant Chirac’s
opposition to the U.S. war against Iraq and attempt to pursue a
balanced policy toward the Middle East.

This illustrates the fact that the “fight against anti-Semitism” is
increasingly being injected into geopolitical discussion, as a
pretext for stigmatizing growing opposition to policies of both
Israel and the United States.

This stigmatization has reached a new pitch with the current campaign
to silence, legally or illegally, the French comedian Dieudonné. The
campaign began back in December 2003 following a short TV sketch in
which Dieudonné, dressed as a uniformed Israeli settler in the
Palestinian occupied territories, called on young people to “join the
American-Zionist axis of good”. This was punctuated by “Isra-heil !”
An uproar ensued. Jewish organizations were largely successful in
forcing theaters around France to cancel Dieudonné’s appearances,
sometimes by threatening violent disruption. Nevertheless, courts
dismissed all the numerous lawsuits brought against him. When he
succeeded in finding a theater that would let him perform, he won
standing ovations from a full house.

Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala is the French son of a mother from Brittany
and a father from Cameroon. As rather frequently happens, his
education in Catholic schools turned “God-given” (the literal
translation of his Christian name) into a freethinker sharply
critical of all religions. In his one-man shows, he habitually
parodies all religions without exception including the animism of his
African ancestors. Irreverence is a staple of French humor, which
constantly ridicules Catholicism and Islam in the most outrageous
terms.

Insisting on his commitment to equality and universal human values,
Dieudonné has refused to censure himself as his critics demand. They
have been lying in wait. In a press conference in Algiers last month,
he cited the expression “memorial pornography”, coined by an Israeli
historian, Idith Zerkal, to refer to aspects of certain
commemorations of the Holocaust. Apparently, none of the Algerian
journalists saw fit to report this particular remark, which reduced
it to a private expression. However, it was picked up by a Zionist
website, www.proche.orient.com, which
spread the word that Dieudonné had described the Shoah as “memorial
pornography”.

A new and more violent “Dieudonné affair” was launched. The stock in
trade of comedians is excess and bad taste. On both those counts,
Dieudonné is relatively mild. His manner is good natured; with none
of the venom caracterizing certain U.S. talk show hosts. Back in
Paris, Dieudonné told the press that his words had been distorted. He
had never mentioned the Shoah itself, and stressed his respect for
the victims of that great tragedy-a tragedy for all humanity.

But it was not enough to correct misquotes.. Whatever his words,
hostile reporters demanded to know: “but what did you mean?” In other
words, what did you think? The criminalization of spoken words leads
almost inevitably to the attempt to criminalize unspoken thoughts.
Explaining his political outlook, Dieudonné said that his fight
against racism led him to oppose “exacerbated communitarism” which
sets one religious community against another. But why was there no
memorial for victims of the slave trade? Why was it that subsidies
were available for some 150 films on the Holocaust, while he was
unable to get backing for a film on the “code noir”, the legal basis
for the French slave trade? This did absolutely nothing to assuage
Dieudonne’s critics, and the chorus of media attacks in the following
days became more virulent. Bernard-Henri Levy flamboyantly described
the comedian as the “son of Le Pen”- regardless of the well-known
fact that in his home town of Dreux, Dieudonné has been politically
active in opposing Le Pen’s National Front. For Dieudonné, the
cancellations and death threats are pouring in.

Even if he wins in court, as he has in the past, the media are
clearly out to destroy him. The significance of this campaign goes
far beyond its effects on the career of a talented young performer
with children to support. Two more general effects can be signaled.

First of all, the campaign against Dieudonné amounts to an attempt to
silence a leading voice of secular universalism with a strong
following among young people of all communities in France,
notably-but by no means exclusively-among children of immigrants from
African and Arab countries. Many, unlike him, are religious. But if
veiled Muslim girls can laugh at the comedians’ satire of Islamic
extremists, why is similar satire of Orthodox Zionist settlers not
allowed? Why does the CRIF have more influence than any organization
representing the far more numerous Muslim community? Isn’t the
secular universalism of Dieudonné a healthy response to the threat of
conflict between religious communities? Secondly, and perhaps of even
greater significance, the campaign against the French comic is a
small part of a broad tendency to use the charge of “anti-Semitism”
to silence criticism of United States policy in the Middle East,
including the conquest of Iraq. This is sometimes blatant and
sometimes subtle. The expression “memorial pornography” is no doubt
lacking in both precision and good taste. But it expresses a certain
fatigue, not least among a number of Jewish high school students,
with the constant commemoration of a terrible past tragedy, to the
exclusion of others (the bombing of Hiroshima, for example). There is
a growing suspicion that this repetition is not really helping to
ensure that “it can’t happen again”. Rather, it is being exploited to
silence opposition to the war policies of the United States and its
main partner in the Middle East. Such opposition, after all, was the
meaning of Dieudonné’s parody of “the axis of evil”-essentially
concerned with the present and the immediate future, and by no means
a denial of the past.

On the ideological level, the constant reference to the Holocaust,
with the suggestion that a new persecution of Europe’s Jews may begin
tomorrow, creates a subtle but profound cleavage between the United
States and “old Europe”. For Germany, obviously, but also-with
infinitely less justification, but equal insistance from American
critics-for France, reference to the Holocaust arouses an endless
sense of guilt, disqualifying those European powers from any future
geopolitical role.

For the United States, on the contrary, the Holocaust has become the
key feature of an ideology justifying U.S. military intervention to
“save victims” around the world. This is based on the mythical notion
(which ignores, among other things, the decisive role of the Red Army
in defeating the Third Reich) that it was the United States that
finally came to the rescue of the victims of the Holocaust. The
implication of this myth, which underlies the enormous exaggeration
of “the return of anti-Semitism” in France, is that Europeans, if
left to their own devices, will probably start to persecute the Jews
once again. And only the United States can stop them.

Thus the myth of benevolent U.S. military intervention is empowered
by the ideological exploitation of the Holocaust, just as “old
Europe” is disempowered by it. This is one reason why politicians and
media in Europe by no means all of them Jewish-who want their
countries to follow Washington find it politically useful to keep
harping on the Holocaust.

This is not respect for the victims but exploitation of them. By a
constant implicit blackmail, the pro-NATO politicians and media help
keep Europe morally crippled, disqualified from opposing the U.S.-led
wars to remodel the Middle East.

There seems to have been more indignation in French media over some
garbled reports of remarks by Dieudonné than over the total
destruction of the Iraqi city of Fallujah. In such a world, is there
much place left for humorists?

Diana Johnstone is the author of
Fools’
Crusade : Yugoslavia, Nato, and Western Delusions published by
Monthly Review Press.

SITE SOURCE : http://www.counterpunch.org